Something tells me this kind of neighborly affection isn't what the Bush administration has in mind when they talk about a new, democratic Iraq. From Reuters:
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has accepted an invitation to visit Baghdad, Iraq's Foreign Ministry said on Wednesday, a landmark trip that would make him the first leader of Iran to visit its former foe.
Iran and Iraq fought an eight-year war in the 1980s in which hundreds of thousands were killed, but relations have improved since Saddam Hussein was ousted in the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 and a Shi'ite Islamist-led government came to power.
"President Ahmadinejad has accepted an invitation from President (Jalal) Talabani to come to Iraq," Iraqi deputy Foreign Minister Labeed Abawi told Reuters.
An aide to Ahmadinejad, who asked not to be identified, said: "We have heard about it but no date has been scheduled."
Both Talabani and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki have visited Shi'ite Iran, which some Middle East analysts say exerts greater influence in Iraq than the United States.
Ahmadinejad has accepted the invitation at a time of heightened tension between Iran and the United States, which said its warships were threatened by Iranian craft in the Strait of Hormuz earlier this month.
I wonder what U.S. troops stationed in Iraq think of this impending visit. Is this what a democratically elected Shia-dominated Iraqi government--made possible by the blood, sweat and sacrifice of the American military--is all about? And if so, what does the future hold for Iraq and the region (which Iran, incidentally, seeks to dominate)? In the meantime, the U.S. military has released some vital and fascinating information about the background of foreign Al-Qaeda fighters flooding into Iraq. The documents are yet another blow to that old liberal theory that terrorism is caused by poverty.